Change software name

[Catskart]

Because your software won't be bashed by some "other" users.

Because I've enought to fight in this stupid debate "SMBX 2.0 vs SMBX 1.4.4"

Because 1.4.4 become very different from original SMBX.

Because keeping "SMBX 1.4.4" as name will take this software as underversion than 2X.

Because I don't want 2X Beta 4 will make shadow to 1.4.4.

[MidoriNeko]

I agree

[Ariinui]

True dat, i usually use 38A but an other name should be usefull

[NightyThomas456]

I totally agree! That stupid "38A vs 2.0" war should REALLY stop!!

[delete this account]

I agree

[PK Esper]

i freaking hate 38-A vs 2.0 thread so much, so i agree, it could've changed the "SMBX 1.4.4" name to something.

[the GaMERDoG]

I agree with Catskart, 38A does need to do that.

[Catskart]

I didn't expect that I have a lot of people who are agree with me, thank.

[delete this account]

You're welcome!

[Yoshi021]

It will be very dangerous to change the name of SMBX at this point. It there is a change 38A will have to be very careful to what he chooses. In the current state, I don't think it is a good idea to do a name change.

[Catskart]

It will be very dangerous to change the name of SMBX at this point. It there is a change 38A will have to be very careful to what he chooses. In the current state, I don't think it is a good idea to do a name change.

Choose name is a important thing.
But It's a nice idea to be independent of smbx 2.0, It's dangerous if he keep always "smbx" by name, it won't be let alone.

[Coolio__]

It will be very dangerous to change the name of SMBX at this point. It there is a change 38A will have to be very careful to what he chooses. In the current state, I don't think it is a good idea to do a name change.

Choose name is a important thing.
But It's a nice idea to be independent of smbx 2.0, It's dangerous if he keep always "smbx" by name, it won't be let alone.

If 38A keeps SMBX as the name, Nintendo may eventually find out about it and force him to take it down like the original.